[Rotary] Fwd: failure notice

[Donna Schuler]

I agree. The finemaster needs to remember to inform the speaker of the time
limit. It makes everyone more comfortable with the expectations of the
meeting.

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Harold Hauck <hhauck at mcn.org> wrote:

> As I recall, our club has traditionally allocated 30 minutes for the
> speaker.. I do not favor reducing that amount of time. Perhaps we need to
> do a better job of advising the speakers of the time limit. I thought Gary
> did a good job last week by standing in the back for a couple of minutes
> and then moving to the front of the room as the speaker continued on. This
> might have been more effective if the speaker had been informed ahead of
> time that Gary would stand at 25 minutes.
>
> Regards,
>
> Harold
>
>
>
> *From:* rotary-bounces at lists.mcn.org [mailto:rotary-bounces at lists.mcn.org]
> *On Behalf Of *JPorter631 at aol.com
> *Sent:* Friday, September 02, 2016 2:08 PM
> *To:* Peterose at mcn.org; rotary at lists.mcn.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Rotary] Fwd: failure notice
>
>
>
> Twenty minutes  ought to be MAX.  What say you Gary?  John P
>
>
>
> In a message dated 9/2/2016 11:48:51 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> Peterose at mcn.org writes:
>
> Rotary members who are having speakers try to keep the speeches to twenty
> to twenty five minutes so we can do club buisness thanks
>
> Sent from Pete Rose/Hall of Famer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rotary mailing list
> Rotary at lists.mcn.org
> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/rotary
>
>


-- 
Donna Schuler
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mcn.org/pipermail/rotary/attachments/20160905/3f9b6a35/attachment.html