[Kzyxtalk] "Uninsurable Risk"

[smmail]

I am no legal eagle but I have served on civil juries and been a witness 
in civil trials. You have to prove a monetary loss before you can sue 
somebody for compensation. If you are wondering what the legal expenses 
were for, just ask your best bud John Sakowicz because he was on the 
KZYX BOD when they were incurred. My guess is that they were 
consultations to provide expert advice to make sure that the station was 
in compliance with rules and regulations. So, if true, you, King, and 
your nescient little group are responsible for the expenses. Because 
there are no sweeping changes I think the station is probably in 
compliance. Your track record for accuracy is pretty dismal. SM

On 6/11/2016 8:16 PM, Scott Peterson wrote:
> Mr./Ms. SM,
>
>
> Gee, you sound pretty well versed in legal issues. But how do you 
> explain the
>
>
> all the money in legal expenses that MCPB had to pay in 2014? Here 
> they are:
>
>
> http://990s.foundationcenter.org/990_pdf_archive/680/680050440/680050440_201406_990.pdf
>
>
> They're on page 10, item 11b. $29, 164. Were you lecturing to MCPB 
> directors
>
>
> then? How'd that work out for you? What about MCPB?
>
>
> One thing I know about legal actions. It's never a good idea to 
> comment on
>
>
> anything that's either pending or ongoing.
>
>
> So I'll have to say 'go fish' for now, Mr./Ms. SM.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Scott M. Peterson
>
>
> Mendocino
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>
> > I just caught up on your latest addition to your conspiracy theory. What
> possible financial responsibility do you think that the volunteer
> directors of a non-profit corporation, and the corporation itself for
> that matter, have. You threaten suit, but you have to have a
> documentable financial loss to sue for compensation. Sue because you
> didn’t get the programming you wanted, now there is a laugh.
>
> I also am unable to make heads nor tails of your statements regarding
> the 990 tax form or your comment about how the station has already
> released member contact information. They haven’t. Why not list a
> specific circumstance that you think is improper along with the law or
> regulation that you think it violates, and then explain what the
> complaint in your suit would specify? SM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kzyxtalk mailing list
> Kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org
> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mcn.org/pipermail/kzyxtalk/attachments/20160612/bf1ef359/attachment.html