[Kzyxtalk] Tim-your message lost
King Collins
king at greenmac.com
Fri May 16 21:46:03 PDT 2014
Hmm. I did not receive it in my email account. And as you can see from my last post, it was reported to be an html doc that was scrubbed.
When I click on the notice (that the html was scrubbed, I get the following which is decisperable, but evidently not what you see. --king
* * * *
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">This is a valid point. There has been
some replacement; my research indicates a net shift from local to
syndicated of 5.5 hours/week of public-affairs programming and 4
hrs/wk of music programming since 2009. I don't think this was a
management goal, so much as a series of ad-hoc decisions when
situations arose. Diane is undoubtedly correct that it has much
to do with the relative burden on staff of syndicated vs. local
production.<br>
<br>
Training and supervision of programmers - old and new - is
something I have been requesting more of for years. We got some
excellent pledge-drive training back in 2007, which made an
immediate and noticeable improvement. Vance Crowe and I held some
workshops the following year, but since then we've had the
financial crisis and lost 4 full-time staff members, so programmer
training (which takes a lot of time and effort) hasn't been a
priority. Rich has been training people when new equipment is
installed and whenever individuals have specific questions, but
it's a huge burden on him to try to improve the skills of 100+
programmers while keeping the equipment operating. Mary seems to
have her hands full just managing all those people and plugging
holes in the schedule when someone takes a vacation.<br>
<br>
I think it would be helpful for anyone who shares Diane's concerns
about local vs. syndication, and the value of training
programmers, to write letters expressing their concerns to station
management and the Board. It would be especially helpful if this
were done in a non-confrontational way, without accusing staff of
malfeasance etc. Simply make known your desire for more local
programming and better training for programmers.<br>
<br>
This is the kind of change I am wholeheartedly in favor of:
improving the quality of our product, especially of the parts we
produce locally. It's not easily done, in part because people get
pricklish when you ask them to improve - they often take that to
mean you think they aren't quite good enough already. Some
programmers have no desire to improve or do anything differently
than they are already doing. Change is always resisted. <br>
<br>
It's also quite difficult to find and develop talented local
programmers who will make the commitment to a regular radio
shift. In that regard, I think it is remarkable that we have so
many, given our population and demographics. From conversations
with station staff, I can say they are always looking for new
programmers and are frustrated by how difficult the search is. <br>
<br>
All the best,<br>
Tim<br>
-- <br>
<a href="http://oakandthorn.wordpress.com">Oak & Thorn</a><br>
Facebook: Oak and Thorn<br>
<br>
On 5/16/2014 5:48 PM, Diane Paget wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5376B1E0.8030309 at mcn.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I would rather address the larger problem of the replacement of local
programming (due both to censorship and to the fact that it is easier to
slip a CD into the machine than to train and supervise new programmers)
with national programming and the deterioration of the quality of what I
can hear on KZYX.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature"><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>
On May 16, 2014, at 9:26 PM, Diane Paget wrote:
King,
Tim's message was posted to the list and was totally readable.
Diane
King Collins wrote:
> Tim Bray,
> Over the last weeks, a couple of your messages have been lost because the content is in html and is scrubbed.
>
> Please repost your last message which was in response to Diane. If in doubt change the format to "plain text."
> --king
> Here's what your message looks like from the archives, and I don't think anything is posted to the list although I'm not sure about that:
>
> Tim Bray tbray at wildblue.net
> Fri May 16 20:46:39 PDT 2014
>
> • Previous message: [Kzyxtalk] Kzyxtalk Digest, Vol 4, Issue 23
> • Next message: [Kzyxtalk] Steffen vs. Bosk - how resolve?
> • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.mcn.org/pipermail/kzyxtalk/attachments/20140516/5d9b3a45/attachment-0001.html
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kzyxtalk mailing list
> Kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org
> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk
>
>
_______________________________________________
Kzyxtalk mailing list
Kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org
http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mcn.org/pipermail/kzyxtalk/attachments/20140516/698d0cac/attachment.html
More information about the Kzyxtalk
mailing list