[Kzyxtalk] Different kind of station?

[Patricia Kovner]

Do you know how the Thursday forum will go?  How many minutes we each will have, etc?  I want to write a statement and time it.  Thanks, P.



On Sunday, March 2, 2014 11:08 PM, doug mckenty <dougmck at gmail.com> wrote:
  
Tim,

I feel like we are finally cutting threw the BS and getting to the crux of our differences.   Is programming a management decision?  This is John's contention, and I appreciate that.  I am not asking to win an argument, I am asking to be allowed to have that argument in public, and have the members decide who wins.   

I believe that when the mission statement says the membership "controls the programming and operational philosophy of the station," that gives the board the job of deciding what those will be.  They can hire a manager to make those choices, which the current majority has agreed to do, or they can set up a committee, like the PAC, to help make those choices, which boards in the past have tried.  This is the prerogative of the board. 

In the end, i am really happy that we are having a solid contested election where all these issues have come up.  They even published an agenda before the meeting this time.  I wish we were having these conversations on the radio and am looking forward to the candidates debate. 

Doug

On Sunday, March 2, 2014, Tim Bray <tbray at wildblue.net> wrote:

Hi King,
>
>Thanks for the kind words of support and appreciation.   
>
>It seems to me that you and I both want more and better
      communication from station management and the Board.  Where I
      think we differ is in the degree of participation by the
      listenership in management decision-making.  You seem to want the
      station to be run as a kind of collective, with participatory
      decision-making, and I see that as leading to a different kind of
      station than the one we have.  (I think that management model is
      unworkable and would lead to paralysis or worse.)  It seems to me
      that you also want more airtime devoted to station business, with
      listener participation, and less to... well, what, exactly would
      you have less of on air?
>
>That said, we do agree about the desire for more communication
      from and between management and staff.  I have been working for a
      long time to get that for the Programmers at least, because it
      frustrated me when staff would make changes at the station and I
      would find out about it on Sunday morning at 7 AM when I arrived
      for my shift.  The current staff is MUCH better about
      communicating with programmers than they were when I started
      there.  We generally do get informed in advance about changes that
      will affect how we do our programs, with training and guidance.   
>
>Cheers,
>Tim
>
>p.s.  I hope you didn't take "perennial gadfly" as a slight.  It
      just seemed an accurate phrase - and one that has probably been
      applied to me at times as well.
>
>
>
>On 2/28/2014 10:32 PM, King Collins wrote:
> 
>Dear Tim Bray (and others of like mind), I like your program and I see that you work very hard to raise money for the station. Thanks very much. Early on you mentioned my name as one of the sources of complaints (below) and said that people like me "want a completely different kind of station." Would you please explain what you meant by that? And I do not mean to be confrontational. I really want to know. Thank you, 
King Collins Tim Bray said (excerpted):  .... there really isn't merit to the attacks on station management....Most of the complaints arise from a few causes (including) perennial gadflies who want a completely different kind of station (King Collins et al). * * * *
_______________________________________________
Kzyxtalk mailing list Kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk   
>
>
>-- 
>Oak & Thorn
>Facebook: Oak and Thorn  

_______________________________________________
Kzyxtalk mailing list
Kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org
http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mcn.org/pipermail/kzyxtalk/attachments/20140303/33f232e2/attachment.html