<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Jun 20, 2016, at 1:50 PM, <<a href="mailto:dennisobrien@sharejerusalem.com">dennisobrien@sharejerusalem.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">At that time, the Members voted to create a designated director, i.e., a director chosen by some process other than direct election by the Members. In 1990, the designated director was the General Manager; later amendments by the Board of Directors changed that to the Programmer-elected Director. Since the later change did not adversely affect the voting rights of the members, it was allowed under state law. Therefore there is no violation. The current Bylaws and amendments were properly adopted, and the current Programmer-Director was legitimately chosen.</span></blockquote><br></div><div>Isn't that interesting. Transparency resolves the issue. --kc</div><div><br></div><br></body></html>