<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Dear Mr./Ms. SM,<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>You have a point on the proposed FCC rules for 2018. I overlooked the </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>implementation date. That's why I provided the link. So that my work</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>could be checked. I didn't see any such links in your rebuttal. Which </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>makes it impossible to check your work. Making it all rhetoric. </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>But since that's your specialty, try this on for size. Each of five Form </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>990s in a row, 2010 through 2014 have an unusual policy about the </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>review of those Form 990s. It's written into Schedule O at the end of</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>the form. You can find them here:</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://nccsweb.urban.org/communityplatform/nccs/organization/profile/id/680050440/popup/1" target="_blank">http://nccsweb.urban.org/communityplatform/nccs/organization/profile/id/680050440/popup/1</a></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>The policy is this: "No review was or will be conducted." Keeping </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>five Form 990s in a row away from voting board members.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>So rhetorically speaking. What could be the purpose of that policy?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Also, the person who filed those Form 990s -- and the accountant</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>who filed them -- swore that no audited financial statements had</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>been prepared. You can find them all here:</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.kzyx.org/index.php/about-us/station-business/mcpb-bylaws-and-financial-statements" target="_blank">http://www.kzyx.org/index.php/about-us/station-business/mcpb-bylaws-and-financial-statements</a></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>This was the same accountant who supposedly <span style="font-size: 12pt;">prepared the audited </span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">financial statements that appear on KZYX's </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">website. For the same </span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">five-year time period. Aside from total </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">incompetence or fraud, how</span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">do you explain that?</span></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>And finally. Aside from shame or fear, what's the purpose of hiding</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>your name here?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Sincerely,</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Scott M. Peterson</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Mendocino</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><pre style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">> So Scott, you demanded that KZYX put their donor list up immediately on
the basis of a document that said the station didn’t have to comply
until 2018. I am sure that the staff are having a good laugh.</pre></div> </div></body>
</html>