<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">Dear Mark Perkins,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">
With all due respect, I think you should stick to the technical side of things, and not try to create Stasi-like files on programmers, staff, or board members at KZYX.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">
<br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">...</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:10 AM, id <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marktime@mcn.org" target="_blank">marktime@mcn.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=""><br>
On Jul 9, 2014, at 1:34 PM, doug mckenty wrote:<br>
<br>
> Where did this come from? I looked around the KZYX web site and did<br>
> not see this, nor did I find the agenda for Monday's meeting BTW. <br>
<br>
</div> Hi Doug , Tim<br>
I pulled the two official lists off KZYX web site around 2007 when we<br>
were working to improve some aspects of the station .<br>
<br>
I made the third as a template or starting place after reviewing A.<br>
Maslow's work on maturity . Feel free to modify for the better . When<br>
sent in , they should become part of the stations FCC files, records ,<br>
open to the public . Thanks for you work .<br>
<br>
Tim , as you know , a whopper Earthquake will again hit our region ,<br>
we have 4 or so studios , and three transmitters and need to implement<br>
a way to cobble together some sort of working system in the aftermath<br>
of a big EQ . As it is , everything is Philo centric , if a weak link<br>
in Philo fails , the whole system is down . I feel it would be wise to<br>
enable the local studios to access the local transmitters as a<br>
potential failsafe so that there will be / some / post diaster signal<br>
on the air to aid in recovery . Do you know if KZYX, HAS a Diaster Plan<br>
?<br>
Please check out the scenarios in Cascadia Region Earthquake<br>
Workgroup : <a href="http://crew.org" target="_blank">crew.org</a><br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Maslow" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Maslow</a><br>
Most folks have no idea of the scale of what happens in a<br>
major subduction event , and we are due for some .<br>
m<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
><br>
> Programs and programmers are supposed to come under yearly review<br>
> according to the current Station Handbook. This is standard operating<br>
> procedure at most community radio stations and is not meant to be<br>
> Orwellian, just a way to increase production value.<br>
><br>
> One of the major aspects I really liked about the PAC was that it gave<br>
> transparency to this process in order to ensure objectivity.<br>
><br>
> Doug<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Tim Bray <<a href="mailto:tbray@wildblue.net">tbray@wildblue.net</a>> wrote:<br>
>> The two evaluation forms for programmers were developed by the<br>
>> Program Advisory Council in 2007. The PAC put in a LOT of time and<br>
>> effort developing those.<br>
>><br>
>> The one for Staff & Board is new to me, and it looks like a rough<br>
>> draft. Who developed it, and who would use it? If it's a serious<br>
>> effort and there is an actual process to apply it, then it should be<br>
>> reworked to be more usable. <br>
>><br>
>> The purpose of program evaluations was to improve the quality of<br>
>> our locally-produced shows. The Program Director wanted some<br>
>> objective way of identifying which programmers needed improvement,<br>
>> and of communicating that to those programmers. I think the hope was<br>
>> that such a process would diffuse some of the angry and defensive<br>
>> reactions expressed by some programmers against the PD.<br>
>><br>
>> Not sure what the purpose of a Board-member evaluation would be;<br>
>> isn't this what elections are for?<br>
>><br>
>> Tim<br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Ecology Hour<br>
>> Oak & Thorn<br>
>> Facebook: Oak and Thorn<br>
</div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> _______________________________________________<br>
> Kzyxtalk mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Kzyxtalk@lists.mcn.org">Kzyxtalk@lists.mcn.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk" target="_blank">http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Kzyxtalk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Kzyxtalk@lists.mcn.org">Kzyxtalk@lists.mcn.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk" target="_blank">http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>