[Kzyxtalk] Kosher?

[Doug McKenty]

I have not attached myself to any energy. Those who seek to protect the status quo have done that in order to avoid discussing how they justify not following current policy, placing the station at risk of losing the CPB grant; or discussing how they justify allowing a few people to make programming and production decisions despite the fact that those decisions have cost the station dearly in loss of membership. 

It is much easier to fight about personalities than to actually discuss real policy.  

Doug

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 1, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Tim Gregory <tgregory at saber.net> wrote:
> 
> kruger-dunning effect...what an apt concept. [how long ago did i warn you not to
> hitch your wagon to this energy, doug?]
> ---
> 
> 
> I'm guessing this was written by Stuart Campbell himself...or maybe his mommy.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> From: "Scott Peterson" <scottmartinpeterson at hotmail.com>
> To: "kzyxtalk" <kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org>, ndevall at mcn.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 10:21:59 AM
> Subject: [Kzyxtalk] Kosher?
> 
> Dear Moderator,
> 
> 
> Are comments posted by unnamed participants -- such as the ones below -- kosher
> here?
> 
> 
> Scott M. Peterson
> 
> 
> Mendocino
> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> 
> 
> John Sakowicz said: “Stuart Campbell, a self-appointed "professor oof
> ethics", gets a 2.6 rating out of a possible 5.0 from his students at
> RateMyProfessors.com -- not even a passing grade.”
> 
> This comment explains why you are already a Kruger-Dunning cheerleader.
> First, Stuart did not appoint himself, the College did on the basis of
> his qualifications and merits.
> 
> Second, the Rate My Professor service uses a five point Likert scale on
> which a 2.5 is average and has nothing to do with the ABCDF grading
> scale. You could have easily looked this up. You know, institutions of
> higher learning, even Harvard, are not Lake Wobegon where all the
> professors are above average.
> 
> Third, Stuart’s performance on a student rating has nothing to do with
> his work at KZYX and, therefore, is a classic ad hominem logic fail. You
> have cited his teaching reviews in the past and even excerpted a
> negative portion of text to bolster your obsession. Trolls use this
> behavior and it is known as cherry picking. Your big fail in your cherry
> pick was that you didn’t read to bottom of the review where the student
> said that Stuarts class turned out to be one of the best. Shame on you. SM
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kzyxtalk mailing list
> Kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org
> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kzyxtalk mailing list
> Kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org
> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kzyxtalk mailing list
> Kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org
> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk