[Kzyxtalk] Local vs syndication
Diane Paget
dpaget at mcn.org
Sun May 18 15:36:18 PDT 2014
A lot of what Doug says in this post reflects my experience of the
station since it first went on the air. I used to be a very active KZYX
volunteer, hosted a month public affairs segment for a while, helped my
kids host Rubber Biscuit, wrote and tallied the first two listener
surveys, helped in pledge drives. Then my life got busy and I didn't
have as much volunteer time. When that kind of time returned to my life,
I went back to see if I could help the station out again and found the
atmosphere much more defensive and less welcoming to volunteers. I'm
still a member because I do listen sometimes and I wouldn't want to go
back to what it was like before KZYX, but I listen a lot more to KPFA
and give them more money because I like their programming better.
One of the things that has changed in the past 25 years is the
demographics of KZYX's listeners. In 1990 a greater percentage of the
station's members were people who moved here in the 70's and 80's as
young hippies, back to the landers, political activists and mom and pop
pot growers -- the kind of folks who like the homemade feel of locally
produced community radio. As more baby boomers have retired or
semi-retired here from urban areas and university towns, where they were
accustomed to NPR type public radio stations, there is more acceptance
of (and maybe even a preference for) syndicated shows. Unfortunately
those folks who have moved here from the city in the past 15 years have
lots more money to contribute to the station than those of us who have
lived here since the 70s. So if you are running the station as a
business or even if you are just trying to pay off a lot of debt, there
is going to be a tendency to let the money speak. But the station
started in debt and paid off that debt while providing lots more local
(and edgy -- don't forget the Beth Bosk had a show for years)
programming and half an hour of locally produced news.
A PAC might be able to address the problem of local vs. syndicated
programming if it had the authority to make decisions and there was a
mechanism in place to ensure that the members of the committee were
representative of the membership of the station. The recently restarted
Station Advisory Board members seem to have been hand picked by members
of the Board and maybe the staff. If there isn't a fair, transparent
process for selecting the members of the PAC, it could be just window
dressing.
Doug, do you know if the FCC regs or the station By Laws say anything
about one? What does the current board policy that created the
Programming Advisory Committee say about how it will be selected and
what its powers would be?
The PAC has come and gone over the years. It would be interesting to
look at that history and see why it failed, when it did.
Diane
doug mckenty wrote:
> Tim,
> I am glad that you have been enlightened as to this issue as it has
> been central for me for some time. As the host of Open Lines, I have
> heard this complaint for years. That KZYX is going too NPR, too
> pre-recorded, not enough locally produced material etc. The surveys
> the CAB has put out for years have showed at least 50% of the
> listening audience want to hear more "community" radio and even
> surveys of our own membership (whom theoretically like the current
> programming) show that only about half of them are hardcore NPR fans
> and the other half would still like to hear less canned material and
> more locally produced content.
>
> Nonetheless, over the last ten years KZYX has severely reduced this
> type of content. Because the programming decision making process is
> not transparent, nobody but staff knows who has applied for what kind
> of shows. I have spoken in the past with many who applied for a
> program but were never contacted afterwards (over the years I have
> personally witnessed this about six or seven times and suspect that
> there are others out there). Also, our community currently has no
> ability to affect programming decisions at KZYX so while these
> complaints and surveys have shown us that more "community" radio would
> be beneficial to the station, the communities ideas have no way to
> translate into actual programing changes at KZYX.
>
> This is why I have been advocating for the impementation of the
> current board policy that created the Programming Advisory Committee.
> It would solve both these problems.
>
> It is my belief, after hosting Open Lines, being on the board of
> directors, and analyzing what survey material is available, that KZYX
> would have between 4000-.5000 members if the current operational
> philosophy focused on the "community" aspect of our station rather
> than its "public" aspect.
>
> Staff has been pretty adamant that the public radio formula will (and
> has?) saved the station. Their feeling is the vast majority of
> Mendocino County residents rely on NPR for their daily informational
> needs and this silent but large majority will (and has?) fork up the
> money required. They feel so strongly that this approach is working
> that they have decided implementation of the PAC is unnecessary.
>
> One more thing, this top down management style in which the program
> director decides all the programming is typical of "public" radio
> stations. These stations typically have some local news, NPR and some
> jazz or classical music in the interim. "Community" radio stations
> very often have a committee, such as the PAC, that at least reviews
> all volunteer programs each year, and is responsible for the
> assessment of applications for new programs. This ensures the
> transparency of the process as well as establishing some protocols
> requiring diversity and ensuring that the station is truly open to
> "all points of view." It also prevents one person from inadvertently
> promoting their own perspectives over the needs of the community.
>
> Though I feel that there are only about 2300 really diehard fans of
> public radio in this County (ie the number of members KZYX has
> maintained for the last 10 years) and question the decision to promote
> it over the production of more local content, there is little I can do
> to promote a change except advocate for the PAC.
>
> This has been my central issue for the last twelve months. I
> apologize for not being more clear earlier. The multiple side issues
> and drama are having a real negative impact on my ability to clearly
> state what I believe needs to be done to get the station up to the
> 4000 member mark.
>
> Thanks to you all for participating with this list. After over four
> months of having this communication tool, I am beginning to feel that
> we have occasionally cut through the BS and disinformation and are
> beginning to discover the central issues and what our legitimate
> disagreements about those issues are.
>
> Good communication is the key. Most of the changes I have been
> advocating, such as a move toward more "community" radio, are pretty
> common sense, in my opinion, once all the information is revealed.
> Why any attempt to make common sense change creates so much drama and
> contraversy is beyond me, and I really hope we can move past this
> communication breakdown and start getting some real work done.
>
> Doug
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Tim Bray <tbray at wildblue.net
> <mailto:tbray at wildblue.net>> wrote:
>
> This is a valid point. There has been some replacement; my
> research indicates a net shift from local to syndicated of 5.5
> hours/week of public-affairs programming and 4 hrs/wk of music
> programming since 2009. I don't think this was a management
> goal, so much as a series of ad-hoc decisions when situations
> arose. Diane is undoubtedly correct that it has much to do with
> the relative burden on staff of syndicated vs. local production.
>
> Training and supervision of programmers - old and new - is
> something I have been requesting more of for years. We got some
> excellent pledge-drive training back in 2007, which made an
> immediate and noticeable improvement. Vance Crowe and I held some
> workshops the following year, but since then we've had the
> financial crisis and lost 4 full-time staff members, so programmer
> training (which takes a lot of time and effort) hasn't been a
> priority. Rich has been training people when new equipment is
> installed and whenever individuals have specific questions, but
> it's a huge burden on him to try to improve the skills of 100+
> programmers while keeping the equipment operating. Mary seems to
> have her hands full just managing all those people and plugging
> holes in the schedule when someone takes a vacation.
>
> I think it would be helpful for anyone who shares Diane's concerns
> about local vs. syndication, and the value of training
> programmers, to write letters expressing their concerns to station
> management and the Board. It would be especially helpful if this
> were done in a non-confrontational way, without accusing staff of
> malfeasance etc. Simply make known your desire for more local
> programming and better training for programmers.
>
> This is the kind of change I am wholeheartedly in favor of:
> improving the quality of our product, especially of the parts we
> produce locally. It's not easily done, in part because people get
> pricklish when you ask them to improve - they often take that to
> mean you think they aren't quite good enough already. Some
> programmers have no desire to improve or do anything differently
> than they are already doing. Change is always resisted.
>
> It's also quite difficult to find and develop talented local
> programmers who will make the commitment to a regular radio
> shift. In that regard, I think it is remarkable that we have so
> many, given our population and demographics. From conversations
> with station staff, I can say they are always looking for new
> programmers and are frustrated by how difficult the search is.
>
> All the best,
> Tim
> --
> Oak & Thorn <http://oakandthorn.wordpress.com>
> Facebook: Oak and Thorn
>
> On 5/16/2014 5:48 PM, Diane Paget wrote:
>> I would rather address the larger problem of the replacement of local
>> programming (due both to censorship and to the fact that it is easier to
>> slip a CD into the machine than to train and supervise new programmers)
>> with national programming and the deterioration of the quality of what I
>> can hear on KZYX.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kzyxtalk mailing list
> Kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org <mailto:Kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org>
> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kzyxtalk mailing list
> Kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org
> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk
>
More information about the Kzyxtalk
mailing list