[Kzyxtalk] Fwd: Kzyxtalk Digest, Vol 4, Issue 23

[Diane Paget]

You are right -- censorship is a real issue and needs to be addressed.

But when there are drama kings and queens shouting about it from the 
figurative roof tops they become the issue not the censorship.

Diane

sako4 at comcast.net wrote:
>
>
>
> Doug, my brother, censorship of programmers is not a drama king-type 
> of issue....be it censorship of you or Norman or any other programmer. 
> It's a constitutional issue. Station staff may not revoke your 
> broadcasting privileges for the simple reason of "speaking out". 
> You've been off the air for how many months now, Doug? Six months? And 
> why? You know why.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: *"doug mckenty" <dougmck at gmail.com>
> *To: *tbray at wildblue.net, kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org
> *Sent: *Thursday, May 15, 2014 7:35:15 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Kzyxtalk] Kzyxtalk Digest, Vol 4, Issue 23
>
> I most definitely agree that Mr. Sacowitz is a drama-king and I cannot 
> understand why many around KZYX work hard to manufacture conflict. 
>  Everybody is tired of it and it accomplishes nothing.  
>
> I continue to "back" him because I believe some of the issues 
> presented in his letter to the FCC have merit.  I have been concerned 
> for some time that there is not enough community involvement or 
> transparency in the programming decision making process and, like John 
> S., am a proponent of the implementation of the PAC, and committee 
> system, systems designed to include minority voices.  It is our belief 
> that these changes would bring new members and contribute diversity to 
> the station.  I back him, because he backs the PAC.
>
> I will confess, sometimes it is hard being John Sacowitz's friend.  He 
> seems to arouse controversy wherever he goes.  Despite his tendency 
> toward overreaction, I believe his intentions are honorable even 
> when some of his actions are hard to understand.
>
> We need to get past these conflicts.  They are easy to get sucked into 
> and accomplish nothing.  That includes you Beth.  I don't think we 
> need to go the King/tribunal route but we should keep it civil.  
>
> Doug
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 14, 2014, Tim Bray <tbray at wildblue.net 
> <mailto:tbray at wildblue.net>> wrote:
>
>     Or, he could stop being such a bloody drama-king, making a huge
>     deal out of absolutely everything and attacking everyone he should
>     be working with.   For the life of me, I cannot understand why he
>     works so hard to manufacture conflict.  Nor why you back him when
>     he does so. 
>
>     He has publicly insulted every member of the station staff.  This
>     mess is of his own making.  Instead of filing a grievance, he
>     should apologize; to the staff for his reprehensible attacks, to
>     the Board for his threats to sue, and to the membership for his
>     unconscionable actions over the relicensing. 
>
>     A more humble man would have accomplished more and shouted less.
>
>     Tim
>
>
>     On 5/14/2014 5:08 PM, doug mckenty wrote:
>
>
>
>         I agree with David.  John should just file a grievance and the
>         board will work it out.
>
>         Doug
>
>
>     -- 
>     Oak & Thorn <http://oakandthorn.wordpress.com>
>     Facebook: Oak and Thorn
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kzyxtalk mailing list
> Kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org
> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kzyxtalk mailing list
> Kzyxtalk at lists.mcn.org
> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/listinfo/kzyxtalk
>