[CRNMC] A Precautionary Principle Law?

[Baile Oakes]

Dear All,

Might we seriously consider another general meeting to talk all this out with whomever is interested in manifesting the long term health and viability of the CRNMC ?

hmmmmm?

with love

baile


On Nov 30, 2014, at 3:43 PM, Shannon Biggs wrote:

> Dear Tim, 
> I think that is a worthy discussion, perhaps a conference call to discuss
> would be useful.  
> 
> Best, Shannon
> 
> 
> On 11/30/14, 2:59 PM, "karinajoy" <karinacotler at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> ditto (Tim's comment) for me, too.
>> Karina
>> 
>> On Nov 30, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Tim Rice wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sun, 30 Nov 2014, Charles Cresson Wood wrote:
>>> 
>>>> There have been a significant number of recent posts on this listserv
>>>> about home rule charters, and that is good. But have we (CRNMC)
>>>> seriously considered other options that could be pursued by the CRNMC as
>>>> our next steps? Or have we just jumped aboard this bandwagon of the home
>>>> rule charter? I do hope we keep our options open a bit longer, and
>>>> seriously consider what is best for this County now, and how CRNMC could
>>>> help the County manifest that -- whatever it may be.
>>> 
>>> I was wondering how I was going to articulate these concerns myself.
>>> Thanks Charles for saving me the trouble. :-)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Tim Rice    Multitalents (707) 456-1146
>>> tim at multitalents.net
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> crn mailing list
>>> crn at lists.mcn.org
>>> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/options/crn
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> crn mailing list
>> crn at lists.mcn.org
>> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/options/crn
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> crn mailing list
> crn at lists.mcn.org
> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/options/crn