[CRNMC] A Precautionary Principle Law?

Shannon Biggs shannon at globalexchange.org
Sun Nov 30 15:43:23 PST 2014


Dear Tim, 
I think that is a worthy discussion, perhaps a conference call to discuss
would be useful.  

Best, Shannon


On 11/30/14, 2:59 PM, "karinajoy" <karinacotler at gmail.com> wrote:

> ditto (Tim's comment) for me, too.
> Karina
> 
> On Nov 30, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Tim Rice wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 30 Nov 2014, Charles Cresson Wood wrote:
>> 
>>> There have been a significant number of recent posts on this listserv
>>> about home rule charters, and that is good. But have we (CRNMC)
>>> seriously considered other options that could be pursued by the CRNMC as
>>> our next steps? Or have we just jumped aboard this bandwagon of the home
>>> rule charter? I do hope we keep our options open a bit longer, and
>>> seriously consider what is best for this County now, and how CRNMC could
>>> help the County manifest that -- whatever it may be.
>> 
>> I was wondering how I was going to articulate these concerns myself.
>> Thanks Charles for saving me the trouble. :-)
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Tim Rice    Multitalents (707) 456-1146
>> tim at multitalents.net
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> crn mailing list
>> crn at lists.mcn.org
>> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/options/crn
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> crn mailing list
> crn at lists.mcn.org
> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/options/crn





More information about the crn mailing list