[CRNMC] Status of the ordinance?

[Meg Courtney]

It would not be a zoning ordinance but it definitely could be overturned in the future with another BoS.
> Not necessarily. It'll probably be a zoning ordinance. Hit 'em on all fronts, I say!!
> Karina

Yes, it could be confusing to have two anti-fracking ordinances on the ballot, but I think if we are really proactive about making it clear that ours is COMMUNITY RIGHTS BASED (unfortunately not clear in the title of the ordinance) and complimentary to the BoS ordinance it would be a good thing.

Worse case scenario: If our ordinance fails or vice versa, there will be at least one in place and 2 years to have another go at it in 2016.

-Meg

> 
>> On Thu, 8 May 2014, karinajoy wrote:
>> 
>>> I agree that the Supervisors should go ahead with their ordinance. That 
>>> way, if ours meets a legal challenge, the county will still be 
>>> protected.
>> 
>> That would depend on the nature of their ordinance. From what we
>> learned, it seems that unless it's a rights based ordinance, they
>> are sort guaranteed to be in court if some company wants to frack.
>> 
>>> Thanks, Meg.
>>> Karina
>> 
>> -- 
>> Tim Rice				Multitalents	(707) 456-1146
>> tim at multitalents.net
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> crn mailing list
>> crn at lists.mcn.org
>> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/options/crn
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> crn mailing list
> crn at lists.mcn.org
> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/options/crn

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mcn.org/pipermail/crn/attachments/20140509/7cba4d56/attachment.html