[CRNMC] Single Issue?

[karinajoy]

Just hang in there and I will try to explain it as clearly as I can in a bit - like, maybe tomorrow. Geesh... I wanted to take the day off....

The single subject is the Bill of Rights. Doug was confused. It's complicated and I spent lot's of time trying to get clarity from Ben and Shannon.
K

On Aug 21, 2014, at 3:22 PM, Baile Oakes wrote:

> Well, thanks, Doug, for the explanation but it just made the single issue answer a whole lot more vague for me.
> 
> As Pragna explained to Peggy and I the single issue was the Community Bill of Rights.  Now it seems that the single issue is clean water....well, would that not also affect the poisoning of our clean water by chemical trespass of any cause ?
> 
> Just looking for clarity here.
> 
> Any help out there ?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> baile
> 
> On Aug 21, 2014, at 9:56 AM, dougmck at mcn.org wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> I spoke with Ben at CELDF this morning to clarify some of the language in the ordinance, including the single issue/double issue question that I have heard many in our community ask about.  I feel better about most of what he said in response to my queries and hope to do an interview with him and Shannon in the next month to clarify some of this for all of you.  I do feel it is important to recognize that while Measure F establishes a "Community Bill of Rights" the single issue is that of "The right of our community to clean water."  There is no list of rights in the Measure, only the specific language about clean water.  Though I am personally still somewhat unclear as to how passing this right along with making fracking illegal is still one issue, Ben has assured me that similarly written measures in other states with the same "single issue" requirement has passed muster with courts and other bodies who review this policy.  It is my understanding that that the fracking ban is an enforcement mechanism which uses the "right to clean water" once the measure is passed.  
>> 
>> He also assured me that future Measures can use the same language to add to our list of "community rights" once Measure S is passed.  Also, I would urge those of you in the Charter County movement here in Mendocino County to contact them as well as they have written multiple charters for other communities and they can make sure the language in the Charter is consistent with the language in already written into Measure S and others to follow.
>> 
>> At the end of the day I feel better about our association with CELDF as they seem to have a handle on these questions and have dealt with this on multiple occasions in other areas.
>> 
>> Doug 
>> _______________________________________________
>> crn mailing list
>> crn at lists.mcn.org
>> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/options/crn
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> crn mailing list
> crn at lists.mcn.org
> http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/options/crn