[CRNMC] Three organizational design suggestions

[karinajoy]

Thanks for your suggestion, Charles. 

Totally agree that the workings of individual committees should be handled within the committees, unless we are asking for larger input on specific things.

Arguments between individuals should go thru the process committee, unless we have a conflict resolution committee. Do we?

Karina

On Apr 30, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Charles Cresson Wood wrote:

>  I suggest that arguments between individuals, a "he-said-she-said" type of back and forth, those are not appropriately posted to the listserv. It is also probably not appropriate for details of working groups discussions to be handled via the listserv. So as an example of the latter, the details about selecting a printer of brochures, could proceed within the working group that has taken on that task. In this way we reduce the chances that people get overwhelmed with messages that do not pertain to them, and as a result stop reading the listserv messages. Such guidelines for posting could also help clarify what types of work are partitioned off and assigned to working groups, and what work is done in the wider community of volunteers.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mcn.org/pipermail/crn/attachments/20140430/6d8ed0de/attachment.html