<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Critical thinking involves looking things up. At no-spin resources. Like <div><br></div><div><br></div><div>the National Center for Charitable Statistics here:</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://nccsweb.urban.org" target="_blank">http://nccsweb.urban.org</a></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>And the Registry of Charitable Trusts here:</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://rct.doj.ca.gov/Verification/Web/Search.aspx?facility=Y" target="_blank">http://rct.doj.ca.gov/Verification/Web/Search.aspx?facility=Y</a></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Where you can get information straight from the horse's mouth. But</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>only if you read it. If I've published any 'distortions' here, I've tried to</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>identify them as such. Like five years of Form 990s. All of them filed</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>under penalty of perjury. By authorized MCPB personnel. Who have</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>since admitted they're distortions. Which is disturbing. But only made</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>possible by critical thinking.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>On the other hand, you've got parroting. Getting information from the</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>other end of the horse. It's a lot less work. And less risk too. Especially</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>if you're a programmer at KZYX today. And you'd like to keep your show.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Sincerely,</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Scott M. Peterson</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Mendocino</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div> </div></body>
</html>