<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Mark Perkins posted the attachments in
an e-mail here. I don't know where he found the two from the PAC,
and I suspect he (or someone else) just made up the one about
staff and board.<br>
<br>
I don't think the programmer evaluations have been used since the
PAC fell apart, but I could be wrong. You are correct that we are
supposed to be reviewed yearly, and I hope we return to that. <br>
<br>
Tim<br>
<br>
On 7/9/2014 1:34 PM, doug mckenty wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAKNFa+LuqvS1aF6VWhh2WQcF=Lg_0cF=SqERdBsj4RWCcw083Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">Where did this come from? Â I looked around the KZYX
web site and did not see this, nor did I find the agenda for
Monday's meeting BTW. Â
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Programs and programmers are supposed to come under yearly
review according to the current Station Handbook. Â This is
standard operating procedure at most community radio stations
and is not meant to be Orwellian, just a way to increase
production value.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>One of the major aspects I really liked about the PAC was
that it gave transparency to this process in order to ensure
objectivity.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span></span>Doug</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div><br>
<br>
On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Tim Bray <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tbray@wildblue.net');"
target="_blank">tbray@wildblue.net</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>The two evaluation forms for programmers were developed
by the Program Advisory Council in 2007. The PAC put in a
LOT of time and effort developing those.<br>
<br>
The one for Staff & Board is new to me, and it looks
like a rough draft. Who developed it, and who would use
it? If it's a serious effort and there is an actual
process to apply it, then it should be reworked to be more
usable.  <br>
<br>
The purpose of program evaluations was to improve the
quality of our locally-produced shows. The Program
Director wanted some objective way of identifying which
programmers needed improvement, and of communicating that
to those programmers. I think the hope was that such a
process would diffuse some of the angry and defensive
reactions expressed by some programmers against the PD.<br>
<br>
Not sure what the purpose of a Board-member evaluation
would be; isn't this what elections are for?<br>
<br>
</div>
Tim<br>
<br>
<div>-- <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://ecologyhour.wordpress.com/"
target="_blank">Ecology Hour</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://oakandthorn.wordpress.com" target="_blank">Oak
& Thorn</a><br>
Facebook: Oak and Thorn</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<a href="https://ecologyhour.wordpress.com/">Ecology Hour</a><br>
<a href="http://oakandthorn.wordpress.com">Oak & Thorn</a><br>
Facebook: Oak and Thorn</div>
</body>
</html>