<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>Right?!!!<br><br>Sent from my iPad please excuse typos and brevity<div><br></div></div><div><br>On May 25, 2014, at 8:53 AM, "Baile Oakes" <<a href="mailto:baileoakes@gmail.com">baileoakes@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>Ok, this is a trial run as to what is acceptable on our list serve, </div><div><br></div><div>The following news is an update on Democracy School.</div><div><br></div><div>Seems like today's court has sunk to a new low.</div><div><br></div><div>Today's court is not content with just making corporations persons.</div><div><br></div><div>They are now rewriting the history of the law !</div><div><br></div><div>Off with their heads !</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: georgia, 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 16px; "><div style="font-style: italic; margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: 1.25em; margin-top: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; margin-left: 0pt; font-size: 12px; ">"In Supreme Court opinions, every word matters. When they’re changing the wording of opinions, they’re basically rewriting the law."</div><div style="margin-top: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0pt; line-height: 1.25em; font-size: 12px; "><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/25/us/final-word-on-us-law-isnt-supreme-court-keeps-editing.html" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; text-transform: uppercase; ">JEFFREY L. FISHER</a>, a law professor at Stanford, on how the Supreme Court justices are altering opinions years after they were issued.</div><div style="margin-top: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0pt; line-height: 1.25em; font-size: 12px; "><br></div></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: georgia, 'times new roman', times, serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 16px; "><h3 style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 18px; line-height: 19px; font-family: nyt-cheltenham, georgia, 'times new roman', times, serif; font-weight: 500; "><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/25/us/final-word-on-us-law-isnt-supreme-court-keeps-editing.html?ref=todayspaper" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-decoration: none; ">Final Word on U.S. Law Isn’t: Supreme Court Keeps Editing</a></h3><h6 class="byline" style="margin-top: 5px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 3px; margin-left: 0px; color: rgb(128, 128, 128); font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.2em; font-weight: normal; font-family: georgia, 'times new roman', times, serif; ">By ADAM LIPTAK<span class="timestamp" data-eastern-timestamp=" 4:24 PM" data-utc-timestamp="1400963070000" style="font-family: nyt-franklin, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; font-weight: normal !important; white-space: nowrap; color: rgb(168, 24, 23); line-height: 12px; text-transform: capitalize; "></span></h6><p class="summary" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 7px; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; font-family: georgia, 'times new roman', times, serif; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); ">The Supreme Court has been quietly revising its decisions years after they were issued, a secretive process that has led judges, lawyers and scholars astray.</p></span></div></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>crn mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:crn@lists.mcn.org">crn@lists.mcn.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/options/crn">http://lists.mcn.org/mailman/options/crn</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>