<div dir="ltr"><div>hi folks,<br><br>I thought this L.A. Times article might give us some more ammunition for our campaign.<br><br></div>Ed O.<br><br><span class="" style="width:335px">
<div class="">
<span itemprop="author" class="">By Neela Banerjee</span>
<span class=""><i>This post has been updated. See the note below for details.</i></span>
<p class=""><span class="">April 14, 2014</span><span class="">, </span><span class="">5:44 p.m.</span></p>
</div>
</span>
<p>Drilling operations at
several natural gas wells in southwestern Pennsylvania released methane
into the atmosphere at rates that were 100 to 1,000 times greater than
federal regulators had estimated, new research shows.</p>
<p>Using a plane that was specially equipped to measure greenhouse gas
emissions in the air, scientists found that drilling activities at seven
well pads in the booming Marcellus shale formation emitted 34 grams of
methane per second, on average. The <a class="" id="ORGOV000048" title="U.S. Environmental Protection Agency" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/environmental-issues/u.s.-environmental-protection-agency-ORGOV000048.topic">Environmental Protection Agency</a> has estimated that such drilling releases between 0.04 grams and 0.30 grams of methane per second.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2014/04/10/1316546111">study</a>,
published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, adds to a growing body of research that suggests the EPA is
gravely underestimating methane emissions from oil and gas operations.
The agency is expected to issue its own analysis of methane emissions
from the oil and gas sector as early as Tuesday, which will give outside
experts a chance to assess how well regulators understand the problem.</p>
<p>Carbon dioxide released by
the combustion of fossil fuels is the biggest contributor to climate
change, but methane — the chief component of natural gas — is about 20
to 30 times more potent when it comes to trapping heat in the
atmosphere. Methane emissions make up 9% of the country's greenhouse gas
emissions and are on track to increase, according to the White House.</p>
<p>The Pennsylvania study was launched in an effort to understand
whether the measurements of airborne methane matched up with emissions
estimates based on readings taken at ground level, the approach the EPA
and state regulators have historically used.</p>
<p>Researchers flew <a href="http://science.purdue.edu/shepson/research/bai/alar.html">their plane</a>
about a kilometer above a 2,800 square kilometer area in southwestern
Pennsylvania that included several active natural gas wells. Over a
two-day period in June 2012, they detected 2 grams to 14 grams of
methane per second per square kilometer over the entire area. The EPA’s
estimate for the area is 2.3 grams to 4.6 grams of methane per second
per square kilometer.</p>
<p>Since their upper-end measurements were so much higher than the EPA’s
estimates, the researchers attempted to follow the methane plumes back
to their sources, said Paul Shepson, an atmospheric chemist at <a class="" id="OREDU0000050" title="Purdue University" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/education/colleges-universities/purdue-university-OREDU0000050.topic">Purdue University</a> who helped lead the study. In some cases, they were able to quantify emissions from individual wells.</p>
<p>The researchers determined that the wells leaking the most methane
were in the drilling phase, a period that has not been known for high
emissions. Experts had thought that methane was more likely to be
released during subsequent phases of production, including hydraulic
fracturing, well completion or transport through pipelines.</p>
<p>The airborne readings were a snapshot over two days, Shepson
cautioned, and further research over a longer period and at other sites
are needed to know whether the Pennsylvania measurements are typical.</p>
<p>Much of the natural gas drilling in southwestern Pennsylvania goes
through coal beds, which contain methane that might be leaking out,
according to the study. The researchers speculated that underbalanced
drilling methods — in which the pressure in the well-bore is lower than
the surrounding geology — allows fluids and gases to enter the well-bore
and travel to the surface. Energy producers use underbalanced drilling
because it allows them to capture valuable supplies of ethane and
butane, Shepson said.</p>
<p>The disparity between the researchers’ measurements and the EPA’s
data illustrates the limits of the methods used by regulators, Shepson
said. The EPA’s approach puts regulators at the mercy of energy
companies, which control access to the wells, pipelines, processing
plants and compressor stations where methane measurements should be
made.</p>
<p>“It’s tough,” Shepson said.</p>
<p>Last year, researchers from Stanford, Harvard and elsewhere reported in PNAS that methane emissions in the continental U.S. <a href="http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-methane-emissions-higher-than-estimated-epa-20131127,0,320051.story">might be 50% greater</a>
than the EPA's official estimates. Another study by Stanford
researchers, published in February in the journal Science, also
concluded that the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-methane-leaks-20140213,0,359951.story">EPA underestimates methane leakage</a> from the natural gas industry and other sources.</p>
<p><strong>[Updated 10 a.m. PDT, April 15:</strong> The EPA said it was
aware that non-government scientists had come to “different conclusions
about the level of methane emissions from the oil and gas sector.” Some
of those estimates are higher than the EPA’s and some are lower, the
agency said in a statement.</p>
<p>A slew of new data about methane and drilling is expected over the
next few years, and EPA officials will be reviewing all of it and
updating its emissions estimates as necessary, according to the
statement.<strong>]</strong></p>
<p>The new study comes two weeks after the White House ordered the EPA
to identify ways to cut methane from oil and gas production. If the
agency decides to issue new rules, they must be in place by the end of
2016.</p>
<p>In February, Colorado became the first state to regulate methane
emissions from the oil and gas sector, requiring the industry to detect
and fix leaks and install equipment to capture 95% of methane emissions.
Last week, Ohio adopted rules to get companies to reduce methane
leakage from above-ground equipment used in natural gas development,
like valves and pipelines. Those rules do not appear to address leaks
during drilling.</p>
<strong></strong><br></div>